Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Local 683, Film Technicians

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1968No. Civ. 31069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. * —

Preliminary Statement

The parties to this litigation are and will be hereinafter referred to as follows:

Party

Herbert Pratt, Plaintiff and Appellant Local 683, Film Technicians of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Defendant and Respondent

General Film Laboratories, a division of DeLuxe Laboratories, Inc., Defendant and Respondent

Donald Haggerty, Union Business Representative, Defendant and Respondent Stacy O’Brien, General’s Plant Superintendent, Defendant and Respondent

A general outline of the dispute, of -procedures taken, and of remedies sought…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. PerkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Chester C. Davis, Los Angeles Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Chester C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. El Rancho Unified School District v. National Education Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kaylor v. Crown Zellerbach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Shapoff v. ScullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Mahon v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API