People v. Hallam
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUI, J.—
In this appeal we consider whether the entry during business hours into a commercial establishment’s employee restroom to commit larceny qualifies as “shoplifting” under Penal Code 1 section 459.5 as enacted by the voters in Proposition 47. We conclude that it does.
Nicholas Hallam appeals an order denying his petition for resentencing/ application to redesignate his felony conviction for second degree burglary as misdemeanor shoplifting pursuant to Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Proposition 47 or the Act). (§§ 1170.18, subds. (a)-(e), (f)-(i), 459.5.)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. BunyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re E.P.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- In re E.P.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- In re E.P.California Court of Appeal · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.