Legal Opinion
Lewenstein v. Forman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 4, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The plaintiff brought a bill in equity against Fanny Forman, Hyman Forman and the Germania Fire Insurance Company. To this the defendants demurred and the demurrer was sustained; thereupon the plaintiff moved to strike out the paragraphs in the bill relating to Hyman Forman, and also moved to change the suit in equity against him into an action at law. These motions were allowed.* To this the defendants objected, contending that the note in suit was a joint note, that the makers thereof could not be severally sued, and that the amendments could not be allowed except upon the payment of terms.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clarke v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Alexander v. McPeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Sandford v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Whiting v. BurkhardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Godfrey v. MacomberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,501 in Re Rare Coin Galleries of America, Inc., Debtor. John J. Regan, Etc. v. Vinick & Young, Etc., International Surplus Lines Insurance Company, in Re Rare Coin Galleries of America, Inc., Debtor. John J. Regan, Etc. v. Vinick & Young, Etc., International Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Westminster National Bank v. GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Butler v. Candlewood Road Partners, LLC (In re Raymond)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Rosenthal v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Barton v. Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.