Legal Opinion
Prince Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2006No. 03-AA-1338PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Prince Construction Co., Inc. (Prince), petitions for review of the ruling of the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (CAB or Board) that Prince was not entitled to an interest penalty under the Quick Payment Act (QPA), D.C.Code §§ 2-221.01, -221.06 (2001), on its recovery in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia of $2,506,487 against the District of Columbia. Prince challenges here the CAB ruling that, because Prince entered into a Superior Court consent judgment based upon an underlying claim that sounded in equity, Prince could not thereafter disavow…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Lowery v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Hope Village, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Convertino v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Mason v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- 1303 Clifton Street, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.