Meador v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant stands convicted of burglary in the second degree, his punishment having been duly fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
Since a ruling by the court necessitates a reversal of this cause we will set out only so much of the evidence as may be necessary as a back drop for this ruling.
During the presentation of his evidence the defendant called as a witness Timothy Hunger. Actually the testimony of this witness on his direct examination produced •evidence of slight, if any, probative value in so far as the issues of this case are concerned.
However,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Horsley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Sullivan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Pendley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Page v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Dean v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.