Legal Opinion

Daoud v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2013No. 16-55607UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Edward and Odette Daoud appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Services’s notice of deficiency and penalties against them for tax years 2000 and 2001. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions, Hongsermeier v. Comm’r, 621 F.3d 890, 899 (9th Cir.2010), and for clear error its factual determinations, including the imposition of accuracy-related penalties, Sparkman v. Comm’r, 509 F.3d 1149, 1161 (9th Cir.2007), and fraud penalties, Edelson v. Comm’r, 829 F.2d 828, 832…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Robert W. Bradford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Joseph Edelson and Harriet Edelson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Sparkman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Hongsermeier v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finkel v. Polichuk (In re Polichuk)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Kaufman v. Commisioner of Internal RevenuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API