Legal Opinion

Coady v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Joseph Coady (Coady) has filed a petition for review in this court’s original jurisdiction. The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) has filed the following three documents: (1) a “Suggestion of Mootness”; (2) a “Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review as Sanction for Filing False, Unverified and Untimely Answer to Suggestion of Mootness, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Strike False, Unverified and Untimely Response to Suggestion of Mootness” (Motion to Dismiss/Strike); and (3) an “Amended Application for Stay” (Amended Application). Coady has filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saucon Valley School District v. Robert O.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Mickens-Thomas v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. C. Toland v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API