Estes v. Magee
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
April 23, 1935, in his own hospital appellant performed an appendectomy upon respondent. Following the operation and upon coming out from the influence of a general anesthetic, respondent felt a sharp pain in his left heel and an examination disclosed a large blister, being a burn caused by a hot water bottle left at respondent’s feet in his bed while still under the anesthetic.
Respondent was discharged from the hospital April 29th or 30th but returned every other day for treatment of the burn on his heel. About May 10th appellant advised respondent the burn was not responding to treatment as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HambrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ranta v. RakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- MATTER OF ESTATE OF COURTRIGHT v. RobertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Heath v. Utah Home Fire Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Fountain v. TY & Jim HomIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Skillern v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.