Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Shasta Dam Area Public Utility District

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1955No. Civ. 8642PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Appellant corporation filed the instant action, as a taxpayer, against the respondent public utility district to enjoin the issuance of $150,000 in bonds for the construction of an electrical distribution system. A temporary restraining order was issued, and thereafter a full hearing was held on the merits of the case. Judgment was entered in favor of respondent district, and the temporary injunction was dissolved and a permanent injunction denied. This appeal is from said judgment.

Appellant makes two major contentions upon this appeal: (1) The issuance of $150,000 in bonds would exceed the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Keene Five-Cent Sav. Bank v. Lyon County of State of IowaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1898
  3. Beard Land & Investment Co. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Rosas v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Centinela Valley Secondary Teachers Ass'n v. Centinela Valley Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API