Dollar v. Caddo River Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
From the testimony in this case the court finds the following facts:(1) That the defendant, Caddo River Lumber Company, is and was during the times mentioned in the complaint and intervention engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.(2) That the plaintiff, W. A. Dollar, was employed by the Caddo River Lumber Company in Scott County, Arkansas, from October 24, 1938, to September 30, 1940, and that during all of said employment he was engaged in commerce or in the…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mary Nell Brumbelow v. Quality Mills, Incorporated and H. G. Baker, Individually and as President of Quality Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Walling v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.