Legal Opinion

Cook v. Wirtz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided September 3, 1996No. GD 93-8239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, J.,

The court has before it an oral motion for compulsory nonsuit made by defendant, Dr. Paul Wirtz, at the close of the plaintiffs’ case: Pa.R.C.P. 230.1. Defendant asserts that, on the basis of evidence adduced on behalf of plaintiffs, Clayton Cook (now deceased) and his widow, Jean Cook, have failed to establish a right to relief. Specifically it is argued that they are not parties within the protected class entitled to bring the instant suit and that plaintiffs have not presented evidence sufficient to establish that Dr. Wirtz refused dental treatment to them after learning that they…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. ZamantakisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Doe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Cain v. HyattDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API