Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Connaughton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1996No. 1996-0431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 644.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CONNAUGHTON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Connaughton.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Permanent disbarment—Misappropriation of client funds—Neglect of duties as executor of an estate—Ignoring orders of probate court and Supreme Court. (No. 96-431—Submitted April 15, 1996—Decided June 26, 1996.) On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-43. __________________ {¶ 1} Between March 8, 1993 and July 26, 1994,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. OstranderOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. McGarryOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. MichaelsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API