Legal Opinion

Dolahanty v. Lucey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was commenced in justice's court. The declaration charges that the defendant, with force and arms, and contrary to the provisions of section 1, chap. 272, How. Stat., entitled “ Trespasses on Lands," did cut down and carry off, without and against the leave of the plaintiff, the owner and occupant in possession thereof, divers trees (describing them) then and there being and standing upon the land of the said plaintiff (describing it), whereby plaintiff has lost and been deprived of said trees. It is further alleged that the said premises have been greatly injured and depreciated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. RayMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Newcombe v. IrwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Word v. ColleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Rios v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Raniak v. KrukowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Taylor v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API