McFarlane v. Ray
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb Circuit. The facts are stated in. the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley J.
At the common law, where the defendant pleads liberum tenementum to a declaration in trespass quare clausum, if the declaration does not contain a particular description of the premises, the plaintiff is always liable to be defeated by the defendant showing title in himself to any parcel of land which would come within the general description given; that is to say, which lies within the township named. The declaration in the present case was of this general character, and the defendants had annexed to their plea of the general issue, a notice of title in Frederick Ray; thus…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Livingston v. Peru Iron Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832
- Day v. AlversonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- People v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Ellice v. BoyerNew York Supreme Court · 1832
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gamble v. HorrMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Cottrell v. PickeringUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- John Henry Shoe Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Van Auken v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Cook v. BertramMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.