Desrochers v. Brady
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
It is not in dispute that the plaintiffs, who are partners engaged in the operation of a machine shop, furnished one hundred fifty hours of labor, including the use of machinery, in connection with the building of a “derrick” for the defendant, who conducted an automo*270bile trucking business. They furnished the labor, the value of which they here seek to recover, following a conversation with one Fazel which does not appear in the record.
A judge of the District Court of Lowell found that the price charged by the plaintiffs was reasonable, and that Fazel had apparent or ostensible authority from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Denny v. Riverbank Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Marquandt v. Boston Young Women's Christian Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rintamaki v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Cauman v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Lovett, Hart & Phipps Co. v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Costonis v. Medford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- The Binkley Company v. Eastern Tank, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Thalin v. FRIDEN CALCULATING MACHINE CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Barron v. McLellan Stores Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.