Legal Opinion

Rintamaki v. Cunard Steamship Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 23, 1910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover from the defendant money received by it, according to the first count, for the plaintiff’s use, and, according to the second count for the same cause of action, for breach of contract to convey to one Sinkonen, in Finland, pursuant to a receipt a copy of which is annexed to the declaration, money delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant for that purpose. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and the case is here on exceptions by the defendant to a refusal of the presiding judge * to give certain rulings and to the admission of evidence.

*117The money…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Newman v. British & North American Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Denny v. Riverbank Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. McCarthy v. Brockton National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Lord v. Lowell Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Boston Food Products Co. v. Wilson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API