Legal Opinion

Enrico Roman, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 21, 1983No. 10-82CPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OPINION

SETO, Judge:

This Government contract case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment regarding plaintiff’s “direct access” action under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to recover costs allegedly incurred in excess of the contract amount.

For the reasons stated below the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment and finds that plaintiff’s claim for additional compensation should be denied.

FACTS

General Services Administration (“GSA”) published a Solicitation No. 3VRC-MG-80-S0024, its Invitation for Bids (“IFB”), on April 8,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Newsom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Max Drill, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. George W. Sturm, Doing Business as George W. Sturm Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Space Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. John C. Grimberg Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  2. Avedon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. BCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. International Transducer Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Gresham, Smith & Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API