Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Lazarus
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1961No. Civ. No. 25155PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, sought to recover a commission for which provision had been made in a lease executed by the defendant Lazarus as lessor and by Ronald Priestley as lessee. She relied on no other *659agreement. From a judgment in favor of the defendant she has appealed.
The lease was executed on March 24, 1958, and was for a period of 20 years commencing on November 1, 1958. The lessor agreed to construct upon the demised premises a building suitable for use as an ice palace and auditorium • if the building costs should exceed $100,000, the total amount of such excess…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northrop Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wilshire Realty Co. v. Kry Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967