Legal Opinion
United States v. Blaze
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2002No. 01-1370PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Johnny Blaze, appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) so that he might challenge the district court’s determination that he does not qualify for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mr. Blaze was sentenced to 240 months in prison for his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Romano v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Johnny Blaze, A/K/A Ruben Hur Cedeno, A/K/A "Carl"Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BlazeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003