Romano v. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant John Joseph Romano appeals the denial of habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma first degree murder conviction and death sentence. Romano argues, among other things, that his trial attorneys’ second-stage strategy was constitutionally ineffective. We disagree, and affirm the denial of habeas relief on this and his other claims.
I. FACTS.
A jury convicted Romano of murdering a business acquaintance, Lloyd Thompson. 1 Thompson was a fifty-eight year old gambler with a heart condition. Romano worked for Thompson setting up card games. On…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bullock v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Hung Thanh Le v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Smith v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Hanson v. SherrodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Hawkins v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.