Legal Opinion

Romano v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 25, 2002No. 00-6289PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant John Joseph Romano appeals the denial of habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma first degree murder conviction and death sentence. Romano argues, among other things, that his trial attorneys’ second-stage strategy was constitutionally ineffective. We disagree, and affirm the denial of habeas relief on this and his other claims.

I. FACTS.

A jury convicted Romano of murdering a business acquaintance, Lloyd Thompson. 1 Thompson was a fifty-eight year old gambler with a heart condition. Romano worked for Thompson setting up card games. On…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bullock v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hung Thanh Le v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Smith v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Hanson v. SherrodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Hawkins v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API