Legal Opinion

Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County on October 1, 1969, which denied appellant’s motion to intervene. Teleprompter operates a community antenna television system in New York City and is carried on the assessment rolls thereof, having been assessed $399,213 for special franchises, in the year 1968, by the board. Alleging that these assessments were erroneous and unlawful, Teleprompter petitioner for review of the board’s determination. The city thereupon moved, pursuant to CPLR 1012 and 1013, to intervene in the proceeding. Special Term denied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Teleprompter Manhattan City Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Mount Vernon v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Kirkland v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Pier v. Board of Assessment ReviewNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Vantage Petroleum v. Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API