Legal Opinion
Teleprompter Manhattan City Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtA. Franklin Mahoney, J.
This is a motion by the City of New York to intervene as of right (CPLR 1012) or, in the alternative, by permission (CPLR 1013), in a special franchise assessment review pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law.
The petitioner has commenced a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 740 of the Real Property Tax Law to review a franchise tax assessed against its cable television facilities in New York City. The only named respondent is the State Board of Equalization and Assessment. The proceeding is pending. There has been no undue delay or prejudice.
A review of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Rochester Telephone Co. v. PriestNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- People ex rel. Rochester Telephone Co. v. PriestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- People ex rel. City of New York v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- People ex rel. Rochester Telephone Co. v. PriestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Sterling Information Service, Ltd. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNew York Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970