Legal Opinion

Smith v. Danek Medical, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided October 9, 1998No. Civ.A. 95-1113-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KISER, Senior District Judge.

Before me now are defendants Danek Medical, Inc., Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Sofamor, Inc.’s (collectively “Danek’s”) motions for summary judgement. 1 Defendants move for summary judgement on the ground that this action is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants also move for summary judgement against plaintiffs on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims. Both parties have fully briefed the issues involved and have presented oral argument. The motions are therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons . set forth herein, the defendants’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  2. Adams v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
  3. Adams v. Am. Optical Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
  4. Bailey v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API