Smith v. Danek Medical, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Senior District Judge.
Before me now are defendants Danek Medical, Inc., Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Sofamor, Inc.’s (collectively “Danek’s”) motions for summary judgement. 1 Defendants move for summary judgement on the ground that this action is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants also move for summary judgement against plaintiffs on the merits of plaintiffs’ claims. Both parties have fully briefed the issues involved and have presented oral argument. The motions are therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons . set forth herein, the defendants’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chapman v. DePuy Orthopedics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Adams v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
- Adams v. Am. Optical Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- Bailey v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021