Legal Opinion

Adams v. Am. Optical Corp.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 28, 2019No. Case No. 2:16CV00027Published

1Opinion of the Court

James P. Jones, United States District Judge

In this diversity action, plaintiff Gary Adams, a former coal miner, alleges that he developed pneumoconiosis and silica-induced airway obstruction after wearing faulty respirators manufactured, designed, and sold by defendants American Optical Corporation and Mine Safety Appliances Company. The defendants have moved for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff's claims are barred by Virginia's two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions. For the reasons that follow, I will grant the defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment.

I

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Locke v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Jkc Holding Company Llc v. Washington Sports Ventures, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Caudill v. Wise Rambler, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API