Legal Opinion

Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1992No. 23575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This is an electric utility rate case in which two intervenors appeal the order of respondent Public Service Commission (PSC) granting a rate increase to respondent Carolina Power and Light Company (CPL). Appellant Nucor Steel, CPL’s largest South Carolina customer, appeals the denial of its request for a discount rate; appellant Consumer Advocate (Hamm) contests certain amounts included in the approved rate base. The circuit court affirmed PSC’s order. We affirm.

ISSUES(1) Is PSC’s order on rehearing void?(2) Did the parties timely appeal to the circuit court?(3) Is there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Hamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Hamm v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Hamm v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API