Legal Opinion

Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1997No. 81356, 81655PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The question is whether it was error to exclude a badly burned child from a portion of his damage suit trial because of his physical appearance. We hold that it was, and reverse.

¶ 2 Eric Cary is a boy who was severely burned when the water heater in the garage of his home exploded. He was trapped in the garage until rescued by his mother, and suffers from permanent disfigurement. At the time of the incident he was almost three years old. His mother brought this suit on his behalf1 alleging negligence on the part of the defendant Oneok in inspecting and lighting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Florida Greyhound Lines v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Kimithi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green v. North Arundel Hospital Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jordan Ex Rel. Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kesterson v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API