Kesterson v. Jarrett
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nahmias, Justice.
Under the longstanding law of Georgia, the parties to a lawsuit. have a fundamental right to be present in court during the trial of their case. The issue presented in this appeal is whether a party máy be denied that right and excluded from the courtroom because her *381physical and mental condition may evoke undue sympathy from the jury and thereby improperly prejudice the other party. This appears to be a question of first impression for Georgia’s appellate courts, likely because exclusion of a party from trial for this reason is such an exceptional event in this State. In…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillips v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Hardy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- PHILLIPS Et Al. v. HARMON Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- In the Interest of J. C. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Morris v. Turnkey Medical Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.