O'brien, Ann C. v. Eli Lilly & Company E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. The Upjohn Company, and Winthrop Company, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Dissent
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
If when a summary judgment has been granted in behalf of four pharmaceutical companies our standard of review is to construe and review the facts in the light most favorable to the pharmaceutical companies, then I too would affirm the grant of summary judgment below. However, since under the law the pharmaceutical companies are not entitled to such a special privileged position, I respectfully dissent.
With precision the majority has stated the applicable precept that we must “review the facts in detail and in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.