Lanford v. York
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
Mr. and Mrs. York sued Drs. Lanford and Schoettle alleging in a one count declaration that Dr. Lanford negligently performed an operation on Mrs. York’s neck, and in a second and additional operation which was not authorized, removed a portion of neck muscle for microscopic study. By a second count Mr. York sought recovery of the damages usually accruing to a husband where his wife has been injured. On the trial of the case the Yorks were required to elect between the charge of malpractice and the charge of assault and battery, and they elected to proceed on the charge of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rolater v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hershey v. PeakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Bible v. PalmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Cady v. FraserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Lackey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Ashe v. Radiation Oncology AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998