Bolognesi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action at law by the United States - against Alessandro Bolognesi and William Hartfield, trading as Bolognesi, Hartfield & Co. Judg-' ment (169 Fed'. 1013) for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, in favor of the defendant in error who was the plaintiff’ below.
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action at law by the United States - against Alessandro Bolognesi and William Hartfield, trading as Bolognesi, Hartfield & Co. Judg-' ment (169 Fed'. 1013) for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, in favor of the defendant in error who was the plaintiff’ below. In the opinion following the parties are designated as in the Circuit Court. The .United States brought an action against the defendants to recover moneys…
1Opinion of the CourtNoyes, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). '[1] The act of 18721 establishing a money order system in the United States, provided in its first section (Rev. St. § 4027 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2741]):
“To promote public convenience, and to insure greater security in the transfer of money through the mail, the Postmaster-General may establish and maintain, under such rules and regulations as he may deem expedient, a uniform money order system, at all suitable post offices, which shall be designated as ‘money order offices.’ ”
Thus in the introduction to the act is the source of congressional authority…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- United States v. Stockgrowers' Nat. Bank of PuebloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1887
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arbitraje Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Rose Check Cashing Service, Inc. v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964
- United States v. NATIONAL EXCH. BANK OF BALTIMORE, MD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.