Legal Opinion
United States v. NATIONAL EXCH. BANK OF BALTIMORE, MD.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1924No. 2203PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be designated as they were below; that is, the United States will be called the plaintiff and the National Exchange Bank of Baltimore the defendant. The District Court sustained a demurrer to the declaration. The plaintiff did not seek to amend, but, when judgment went against it, sued out this writ of error. The allegations of the declaration may he briefly summarized. On June 1, 1922, the plaintiff at Washington by its duly authorized disbursing clerk drew a Veterans’ Bureau check for $4.7.50 in favor of one Beck. After its, delivery to him, it was by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- President of the Bank of the United States v. President of the Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- United States v. National Exchange Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- National Park Bank of New York v. Seaboard BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1936
- Maxwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- United States v. Union Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- United States v. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.