Sheboygan County v. Zimmermann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelsoN, J.
The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict, in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in denying its motion for a new trial. In our view, only the denial of the plaintiff's motions to direct a verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, need be considered.
The sole question to be determined is whether, upon the undisputed evidence, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendants for the sum of $2,439.59.
The material facts are not in dispute. Commencing in 1917 and continuing down to January 2,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnson v. Ætna Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- McKneely v. Brotherhood of American YeomenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Liberty Tea Co. v. La Salle Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Winner v. BaumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.