Liberty Tea Co. v. La Salle Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed October 13, 1931:
Fairchild, J.
The form of a special verdict is largely in the discretion of the trial court. “Such verdict shall be prepared by the court in the form of questions, in writing, relating only to material issues of fact and admitting a direct answer.” Sec. 270.27, Stats.
Where the court’s attention is called to a controverted matter of fact essential to sustain a judgment, an opportunity for a finding thereon by the jury should be provided in a proper case. Pratt v. Peck, 65 Wis. 463, 27 N. W. 180; Bartlett v. Beardmore, 77 Wis. 356, 46 N. W. 494;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Musbach v. Wisconsin Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Bartlett v. BeardmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Meyer v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Schulz v. St. Mary's HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1932
- Thoresen v. GrythingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Gilbert v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.