Legal Opinion

Pacific National Bank v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1899No. 3062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—lion. Thomas Oabboll, Jndge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Appellant is a national bank, doing business in the city of Tacoma, and brought this action to enjoin the collection of the remainder claimed to be due for taxes assessed against the stock of the bank for the year 1897. The complaint states that the bank owned stocks of other corporations in the aggregate sum of $86,350, which stocks were acquired in the ordinary course of the bank’s business, to prevent loss, and were of the par value of $86,350; that the other corporations in which such stock was held were located in the state of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. People v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Hepburn v. The School DirectorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Robinson v. FairSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Spokane & Eastern Trust Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ridpath v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. MacLaren v. Ferry CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dexter Horton National Bank v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API