Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1984No. 13243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

Appellant was charged in two counts with burglary, second degree, in violation of § 569.170, RSMo 1978 and stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1978. The right to a trial by jury was waived. Appellant was convicted by the trial court on both counts. He was sentenced to concurrent, five-year terms on each count. On this appeal he complains that the circumstantial evidence in this case was insufficient to support his conviction.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, even where wholly circumstantial, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the state. All…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. State v. PrierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. PuckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. State v. WarfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. HubbardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API