State v. Hubbard

MANFORD, Presiding Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction. Judgment and sentence were entered. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant presents three points, which in summary charge that the trial court erred (1) in submitting the cause to the jury, because the evidence was insufficient, (2) in submitting the verdict-directing instruction, and (3) assuming there was sufficient evidence to submit the cause to the jury, then in not submitting MAI-CR2d 2.10 in conjunction with the aider/abettor instruction which was submitted.

Since appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, a…