Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1969No. 53339PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Defendant was charged with burglary and with stealing during the commission of the burglary. § 560.110 (statutory references are to RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.). The information also charged a prior felony conviction. Under the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 26.01(b), V.A.M.R., defendant waived a jury. The trial was had before the court who found the defendant guilty and fixed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of five years for burglary and five years for the stealing, the sentences to run concurrently. He has appealed from the judgment.

From the evidence offered by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DenisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. State v. HagermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  2. State v. CameronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Newell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. State v. BenfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API