Olson v. Etheridge
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic
Bay v. Williams, 112 Ill. 91 (1884), established the rule in Illinois that the rights of a third-party beneficiary in a contract are subject to immediate vesting and, once vested, cannot be altered or extinguished through a later agreement of the contracting parties without the assent of the beneficiary. Bay, 112 Ill. at 96-97. We are here called upon to determine the continued validity of the Bay rule.
The four plaintiffs in this case are third-party beneficiaries of a promise contained in a contract entered into by the appellant and another party. The circuit court of Bureau County awarded…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. ParrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Bay v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Reed v. BasconIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Eychaner v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Chemetall Gmbh v. Zr Energy, Inc., Joseph T. Fraval, and Arnold BerkovitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Ervin v. Nokia, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.