Legal Opinion
State v. Ware
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1994No. 15163PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of cocaine. She raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support her conviction; (2) whether the results of the urine test should have been suppressed as a privileged probation record; and (3) whether the results of a urine test should have been suppressed as the fruit of an unreasonable search and seizure. We affirm.
FACTS
Defendant was on probation for possession of cocaine. As a condition of her probation, Defendant was required to submit to urinalysis testing. Defendant violated certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. OrgainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. McCoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Starko, Inc. v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLANNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
- Starko, Inc. v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. CastilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Barrington Reinsurance Ltd., LLC v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.