Lumley v. Kapusta
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Jerry and Linda Lumley appealed from a judgment dismissing their action against Elaine Kapusta for specific performance of an oral contract to convey real property located in Mountrail County. Because the district court’s finding that there was no enforceable oral contract between the parties is not clearly erroneous, we affirm the judgment.
f-H
[¶ 2] The Lumleys were long-time tenant farmers of Kapusta’s property in Mountrail County. Kapusta resided in Virginia and wanted to sell her North Dakota property. Linda Lumley and Kapus-ta had telephone conversations…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Trowbridge v. McCaigueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Kaneshiro v. YamashiroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
- Application of Sing Chong Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tarver v. TarverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Hartman v. GragerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- KOKO Development, LLC v. Phillips & Jordan, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2021