Sea-Van Investments Associates v. Hamilton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Sea-Van Investments Associates (Sea-Van) brought a suit for specific performance and/or damages against Marvin and Larona Hamilton (Hamilton) and Clare and Virginia Hellyer (Hellyer) to enforce an alleged contract for the sale of land. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss at the close of Sea-Van’s case, ruling that no contract had been formed. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. It found that a contract was formed, and utilized the disputed legal doctrine of "judicial admissions” to supply a missing material element. We agree with the trial court that there was never a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Saunders v. Lloyd's of LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Rorvig v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Keystone Land & Development Co. v. Xerox Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.