United States v. Clark
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BRUBAKER, Senior Judge:
The petitioner asks that we direct his immediate release from confinement through a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Because we find his continued confinement to be lawful, we decline to do so.
Background
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the petitioner, contrary to his pleas, of rape and forcible sodomy in violation of Articles 120 and 125, Uniform Code of Military. Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 925. The military judge sentenced the appellant to seven years’ confinement, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a dishonorable discharge. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brazell v. UddenbergUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- Lull v. BrobstUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. KatsoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. KatsoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017