Legal Opinion
Kent Anderson v. Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1990No. 88-4044PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a dispute over an interpretation of several complex provisions of the Prevailing Rate Employees Act (the “Act”), Title 5 U.S.C. § 5341 et seq. (1989), and the relevant parts of the Code of Federal Regulations, 5 C.F.R. Part 532 (1988). Appellant Kent Anderson (“Anderson”) is an employee of the Hungry Horse Project (the “Project”), a hydroelectric dam in Montana, operated by the Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”). The Bureau is an appellee, along with the Office of Personnel Management (the “OPM”), the Secretary of the Interior, and the Directors…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Betty Eby, a Widow v. Reb Realty, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Don Dailey Realty, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Olimpia TOVAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Transworld Airlines, Inc. v. American Coupon Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Meyers Ex Rel. Meyers v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- United States ex rel. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 38 v. C.W. Roen Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.