Legal Opinion
United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 22, 2008No. 2:06-cr-00387PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Third-Party Plaintiffs (“Third-Party Plaintiffs”) request summary adjudication that Third-Party Defendant Charles C. Bruner (“Third-Party Defendant”) is a Responsible Party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation And Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., and is liable for contribution of an equitable share of the response costs incurred by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S.EPA”) at the Central Eureka Mine Superfund Site in Amador County, California (“Site”). Third-Party…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. FirstEnergy Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC v. PCS Nitrogen, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Blakes v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. HellmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Walnut Creek Manor, LLC v. Mayhew Center, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.