Legal Opinion · Dissent

Battee v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1950No. 31298Published

1DissentSimpson, C. J.

(dissenting)—I cannot allow this opinion to go unchallenged. In the first instance, we are bound by the provisions of Art. IV, § 4 of our state constitution to exercise appellate jurisdiction. In refusing to review the action of the trial judge in this case, we fail in our duty as outlined by the constitution. In the second place, the holding in this and the cited case is not consistent with other rules laid down by this court.

In the case of Angel v. McKales, 34 Wn. (2d) 912, 210 P. (2d) 812, we reaffirmed a rule which has been followed from the time this court was instituted. In that case,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graham v. Police Firemen's Ins. Ass'n.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hastings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Nearhoff v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Dupea v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API