Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Zitt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 15, 2013No. 12-1277, 12-2865PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Zitt and Joshua Wampler were charged in a multi-count, multi-defendant indictment alleging a heroin conspiracy and substantive counts of distribution. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Zitt was convicted after a jury trial of conspiring to distribute, and distributing, heroin. Wam-pler pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute heroin. Both filed notices of appeal, and we consolidated their cases.
On appeal Zitt challenges the denial of his motion for a mistrial. Because the district court properly exercised its discretion in denying that motion, we affirm the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Chad KonczakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Sisto BernalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- United States v. HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Wallace CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Sandra McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.