Legal Opinion
United States v. Hilliard
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 24, 2017No. 16-1249PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Following a sting operation, Timothy Hilliard was charged with ten counts relating to numerous controlled sales of heroin, a heroin-for-guns trade, and a gun ■ and heroin found during the execution of a search warrant at his home. At trial, Hilli-ard asserted an entrapment defense; the jury ultimately found Hilliard guilty on nine of the ten counts but was unable to reach a verdict on the first count. Hilliard now appeals, asking that we vacate his conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial on the basis of allegedly inappropriate testimony by a government witness…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Norman Calhoun v. Kenneth Ramsey, Sheriff of Kane County, and Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. McKenzie CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Mauricio MarchanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ethel SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Monique BowlingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.