Legal Opinion
KPMG LLP v. Cocchi
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 2, 2012No. Nos. 4D09-867, 4D10-988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
We reconsider the appeal of an order denying the appellant’s motion to compel arbitration of disputes between it and ap-pellee after vacation of our prior opinion by the United States Supreme Court. In *329our original appeal we addressed the arbi-trability of two of four of the claims made by appellee against appellant and concluded that those were not subject to arbitration. Upon petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court, the Court vacated our opinion because we had failed to address the arbitrability of the other two claims. It did not direct reconsideration of the two claims that we had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Kpmg LLP v. CocchiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Anglo American Security Fund, L.P. v. S.R. Global International Fund, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Askenazy v. KPMG LLPMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- DANIEL S. NEWMAN, etc. v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- DANIEL S. NEWMAN, etc. v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Simmons v. Avant Garde Senior Living CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2013