Legal Opinion

Goldthwait v. Bradford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The facts in this cause are substantially as. follows: Bradford and Brownlee, who were the plaintiffs, below, executed to Oliver Goldthwait, one of the appellants, their promissory note for one hundred and eighty-three dollars and twelve cents, to secure which Bradford and wife executed a mortgage to Oliver Goldthwait upon certain real estate named in the mortgage. On the day and after the note was made, Oliver Goldthwait gave to the appellees a written permission, or license, or agreement, that they might purchase any legal claims against him, said Oliver, and which, when so purchased,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sayres v. LinkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Giles v. GullionIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Haugh v. SeaboldIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. King v. ConnIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Shannon v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rosenthal v. RamboIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API