Legal Opinion

Haugh v. Seabold

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam.

William Seabold died. His estate was worth less than three hundred dollars. The Court vested it in the widow, Margaret Seabold. A part of that estate consisted of an account against Emanuel Haugh. Widow Sea-bold sued Haugh on this account. After William Sedbold’s death, Haugh bought a note which said Seabold had given in his lifetime, and pleaded it as a set-off to Widow Seabold’s demand on the above account. The Court refused to allow the set-off

We think this was right. The estate being of less value than three hundred dollars, the law gave it to the widow, and the account sued on…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union National Bank of Oshkosh v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Goldthwait v. BradfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API